Search
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Gabi Spencer on The importance of Process Hazard Analysis studies
- Ephraim Gasitene Phonela on The importance of Process Hazard Analysis studies
- Gabi Spencer on ESC’s TÜV Rheinland Cyber Security Training Program
- David Dewdney on ESC’s TÜV Rheinland Cyber Security Training Program
- David Balfour on Functional Safety (FS) for Technicians – Proposed CompEx modules
Archives
- May 2022
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- August 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- February 2015
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- April 2014
Categories
Supplier Requirements question from IET Safety Critical Systems Course
The IET Safety Critical Systems Course 2016 at Wyboston Lakes allowed me (David Green) and my colleagues from ESC to present on a number of topics relating to how to interpret and apply the IEC 61508 standard. The topics covered included understanding of technical requirements, management of the processes, assessment and competence issues. As a result of my presentation on Functional Safety Management it became clear that passing requirements to suppliers was an area in which people started to think about what they do.

David Green
This requirement has been in the standard since its inception and I have come across different examples of how people pass information to their suppliers. These range from ‘I need a SIL2 system’ through to very detailed Safety Requirements Specification (SRS) documents for the equipment / systems being supplied.
Many people can be surprised when a Functional Safety Assessment is conducted by someone independent of the project, that what has been supplied is inadequate for their requirements. This can result in companies, including those who thought that they had covered everything adequately, to have to conduct more work such as re-running random hardware reliability calculations or changing the installed equipment.
The Standards
IEC 61508-1:2010 requires that you pass on the requirements for your safety system to the suppliers that you ask to supply the equipment.
Clause 6.2.17 states:
‘6.2.17 Suppliers providing products or services to an organization having overall responsibility for one or more phases of the overall, E/E/PE system or software safety lifecycles (see 6.2.1), shall deliver products or services as specified by that organization and shall have an appropriate quality management system.’
What supplier requirements do I need to give to the supplier of MY safety system?
The ideal is to supply an SRS document for the equipment / system being supplied with as much data as possible (See clause 10 in IEC61511). However, this won’t cover everything. You also need to specify the documentation you require to be delivered.
End users will also need to provide (not exclusively):
- SIL requirement (or PLr for machinery to ISO 13849);
- Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD) requirement;
- Maximum acceptable testing intervals for your installation;
- Failure mode actions (what do you want to equipment to do in fault);
- Services available (utilities, power etc..);
- General information regarding the application (including any specific requirements due to the process or environment e.g. corrosive/erosive, vibration, heat, humidity etc..)
Why should I bother?
It may appear that this is something that is adding lots of extra work to your procurement process. However, you need to consider whether the additional (and often costly) effort to fix something later in the process is something that you are willing to accept. It may be that this issue prevents the start-up of the machine or plant.
Maybe your supplier has supplied exactly what you asked for.
Are the suppliers that you use likely to ask for more money to correct the system due to YOUR inadequate specification?
What do you tell your suppliers?
Based on what you have seen in here, how good would you say your requirements specification to your suppliers are?
Would you be able to answer questions about YOUR safety systems when discussions are held with auditors and/or regulatory bodies?
Do you ever confirm that your suppliers Quality System is being audited and maintained?
What next
We hope this helps clarify any questions that came from this issue. If you’d like any further advice, please contact us.