Search
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Gabi Spencer on The importance of Process Hazard Analysis studies
- Ephraim Gasitene Phonela on The importance of Process Hazard Analysis studies
- Gabi Spencer on ESC’s TÜV Rheinland Cyber Security Training Program
- David Dewdney on ESC’s TÜV Rheinland Cyber Security Training Program
- David Balfour on Functional Safety (FS) for Technicians – Proposed CompEx modules
Archives
- May 2022
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- August 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- February 2015
- November 2014
- September 2014
- July 2014
- April 2014
Categories
Proof Testing of Safety Instrumented Functions: A Beginners Guide (Part 1)

David Green
By Dave Green, Engineering Manager, Engineering Safety Consultants Ltd
A key part of any IEC 61511 or IEC 61508 Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Assessment is the Random Hardware Failures verification; does the Safety Instrument Function (SIF) meet its Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD). Achieving this is heavily dependent on the frequency at which a SIF (and its constituent elements) is PROOF TESTED. This means that if the proof testing strategy (frequency, coverage, management etc.) is flawed, risk targets may not be met, despite ‘what the numbers say’. Clearly a good understanding of the principles of proof testing is essential. Here are a few FAQs to get you started.
1. What is proof testing?
Proof testing is defined in IEC 61508 as a ‘Periodic test performed to detect dangerous hidden failures in a safety-related system so that, if necessary, a repair can restore the system to an “as new” condition or as close as practical to this condition’. In simple terms, a proof test is designed to reveal all the ‘undetected/unrevealed’ failures which the device may be harbouring unbeknown to anyone.
2. Why do we need to do proof testing?
When estimating the PFD of a device, the frequency at which a device is proof tested has a significant impact on the overall PFD. Therefore, if the device is not tested at the specified interval, there is a danger that an undetected failure may be left unrevealed until a demand is placed upon it and your safety function will not work when you need it to!
3. Are proof testing and functional testing the same thing?
No! A functional test is usually referred to the testing of a SIF to ensure that the specified function is working correctly. However, in redundant channels, would a functional test reveal all faults? Possibly not; If a subsystem is voted in a 1oo2 configuration, a functional test may detect a dangerous fault of the sensor architecture but won’t highlight how many faults:
A proof test however, should reveal all faults even if there are multiple faults as (typically), ALL elements are individually tested.
What next?
Check out Proof Testing of Safety Instrumented Functions: A Beginners Guide (Part 2), where I discuss:
- Can I conduct a perfect proof test?
- What is Proof Test Coverage?
- How do I conduct a proof test?
- How much will this cost!?
ESC have the knowledge and expertise to assist with producing proof test procedures which will provide the maximum proof test coverage as well as helping in implementing a formal competence assessment strategy. See details of our one day course on the Introduction to Safety Instrumented Systems for Technicians (IEC 61508/IEC 61511).